Visual-DxÓ Ceph Analysis
Ted Rothstein DDS, PhD
How to use Visual-Dx to evaluate dento-facial skeletal parameters, an adjunct to the
diagnosis of deviant dento-facial skeletal morphology.
Trace your patients radiograph.
Select the standard most suitable for age and sex.
On your tracing locate point Sella.
On your tracing, locate point Occipitale (the lowest point on the occipital bone) and Maxillon ("directly below" the key ridge and
midway between the superior and inferior contours of the palate). Draw a line connecting
these two points. This line is the K-W Plane of Orientation (K-W P of O).
Superimpose (register) (overlay) Sellatracing on Sellastandard and position tracing so that
K-W P of Otracing is made parallel to the K-W P of Ostandard. The
tracing is now oriented in the Standard-Tracing Observation Position
(STOP).
Skeletal Profile Analysis: (A-P position of end points Nas, A, B
or Pog in terms of units of standard deviation from the mean)
A. Use STOP, or as an option, if the locus of
Nasion is assumed to be in "normal" position, you
can
B. Register
Nasiontracing
on Nasionstandard with
K-W P of Otracing parallel to the
K-W P of Ostandard to obtain information about the anterior-posterior relation
of the Maxilla and the Mandible relative to the Anterior Cranial Base.
C. Observe where the end pointtracing lies in relation to the mean and its
standard deviation armsstandard and then mark it using the diagram of boxes
provided.
Suggestion
: Using the
9 x 3 grid of boxes provided on the analysis sheet, place a dot (·
) in the box that best describes the anterior-posterior position of the points Nas, A and B or Pog. Connect the dots. Choose
the words that best describe your patients skeletal profile (See the Visual-Dx
Analysis sheet). For example an arrangement of points Nas tracing, A tracing and B tracing which denotes "moderate
prognathic" skeletal profile would appear as shown:

Total Ant. Face Ht.:
(Nas-Me)
A. Use STOP or
B. Register Nastracing on Nasstandard and make K-W P of Otracing
parallel to the K-W P of Ostandard.
C. Observe where the end pointtracing lies in relation to the mean and its
standard deviation armsstandard and
then mark it using the diagram of boxes provided.
Dentition-Max.:
A. Use STOP or
B. Register apex of
U1tracing
on U1standard
and make K-W P of Otracing parallel to the K-W P of Ostandard
C. Use the descriptive words provided on the analysis sheet provided to best
describe the condition.
Dentition-Man.:
A. Use STOP or
B. Register apex of
L1tracing
on apex of L1standard
and make Go-Gntracing
parallel to
Go-Gnstandard.
Mandible
A. Use STOP to assess:
1. Inclination
2. Position and rotation
B. For size and intrinsic form:
Register Artracing
on Arstandard
and superimpose Ar-Gotracing on Ar-Gostandard.
C. For symphyseal height and chin button: register Metracing on Mestandard and make
K-W P of Otracing parallel to the K-W P of Ostandard.
Usefulness of the SD (standard deviation) crosses on each
Normal standard
- The cross marks of the standard deviation are centered on the mean location of the end
point and show in actual size ± 1 SD in the horizontal
and vertical directions. Such a visualization of the range of normal variation helps
you to graphically characterize the extent of your patients deviation from the mean.
- Accuracy of the reproduced standard may be verified by comparing the actual
computed X and Y coordinate measurement of point A (shown on the standard)
with the X and Y coordinate measurements you can measure for point A on the standard you
have.
Features of the standards:
- Age and Sex Specific
Standard #1: Female SA 10 ± 6mos.* CA 9.9 ± 1* N=47
Standard #2: Male SA 10 ± 6mos. CA 9.8 ±
.9 48
Standard #3: Female SA 12 ± 6mos. CA 11.2 ± 1 42
Standard #4: Male SA 12 ± 6mos. CA 11.7 ±
.9 43
Standard #5: Female SA 14 ± 6mos. CA 12.7 ± 1 48
Standard #6: Male SA 14 ± 6mos. CA 13.2 ±
1 45
*SA=Skeletal Age; *CA=Chronological Age
B. "Built in" size
as well as positional and angular data providing comparative bases for:
- Mandibular size (ramus, corpus), form, position, inclination (MPA) and rotation
- Horizontal and vertical position of molars and incisors
- Total facial height (ant. and post); upper facial height; lower facial height
- Anterior cranial base length
Provides insight into angular data that dont "fit"; Now you can
understand why angular measurement employing Nasion are so deceptive. For example in the
study, angle S-N-A was not statistically different between all the samples of Class II and
the controls except for the 10 year old males with Class II whose S-N-A angle was
significantly larger than the controls. The reason became apparent when you examined the
means for S-N and S-A along the X-axis: In the Class II male sample S-N was significantly
larger while S-A showed no statistical difference when compared to the normal
controls. These standards make you aware of where your patient fits along the spectrum of
size differential for anterior cranial base length which is extremely important in the
interpretation of angles which include Nasion.
You can determine the true reason for the Class II or Class III and pinpoint which jaw
is the one that is oversized or undersized.
No actual measurements are required; the composite in toto is the norm.
If you desire having numerical or angular norms either measure them on the standard or
look them up in the dissertation.
Relative ease of use: overlay your tracing (or simply the end points you are interested
in) on the standard using STOP (see above).
Interpretation is based on visual comparison of size, form and position.
Understanding of the mandibular parameters that are deviant is enhanced.
Preparation of Standard:
- The radiographs for the study were drawn from the files of the W.M. Krogman Research
Center For Child G and D in Philadelphia, PA.
- Each lateral head radiograph was traced, and its anatomic and derived end points were
marked off (177 in total). The radiograph was then oriented on an optical scanning machine
so that Pnt Sella became the 0.0, 0.0 point of a Cartesian coordinate axis system with
Occ-Max (the K-W Plane of Orientation) oriented parallel to the horizontal X-axis. Each of
the 177 points descriptive points was then located in a pre-defined sequence and its X and
Y coordinate was computed and registed in a data base array.
- The result of scanning was a deck of IBM cards wherein each end point was described by a
pair of X and Y coordinate data. All 177 points constituted a "mathematical"
model of the skull. The procedure was repeated for each head X-ray in the sample.
- Software was created to measure and average the distance between any two points, or the
angle between any three or four points and well as to calculate proportionate indices.
Such computational power permitted the comparison of a variety of facial parameters in
large samples (N@ 50 "normal" to N@ 50 Class II, div. 1) relatively easy. Thus
given a sample of @ 50 decks the computer calculated the mean X and Y coordinate data
measurement for each of 177 points, relayed the measurement data to a plotter which drew
the mean (averaged) mathematical model of the skull for the entire sample and computed the
statistical difference between the two groups.
- The standard deviation crosses for selected end-points were manually drawn on each of
the six composite normal standards by Dr. Rothstein using the standard deviation values
listed in Table 3 of the dissertation.
Dr. Ted Rothstein
Brooklyn, NY
drted35@aol.com
[Back to Site
Additions]
Special NY Times
Article on the founding of Invisalign
[Email Us]
Home [Site
Additions] Consultation [Lingual Braces
Menu] [Download
an Office Brochure]
[ Q
& A ][ Consultation ][ Meet & Hear Dr. Ted ][ Tooth
Whitening ]
Jaw Wiring FAQ's Jaw Wiring Informed Consent
Jaw
Wiring Link Sites
[ For Orthodontists][ Wisdom Teeth]
[Email Us] [Somnoplasty
to Eliminate Stop Snoring]
[Invisalign: the "no-braces"
braces and so much more] [Menu
for Small Claims Court Info]
The
Orthodontic Glossary of the American Association of Orthodontists